One of the main weaknesses of the traditional security approach is that it assumes everything within an organization’s network can be trusted. One implication of this assumption is that it keeps us blind to threats that infiltrate the network, which are then left to roam freely and attack the network at their discretion.
To overcome this deficiency, organizations must adopt a new approach to protect their modern network infrastructure and fluid network perimeter, which extends to the cloud and accommodates the increasing number of mobile or dispersed users. This new approach is called the zero-trust security model or zero-trust network access (ZTNA).
Zero Trust Security platforms help your organization avoid the following pain points:
- Credential theft and lateral movement: Limits attacker movement by enforcing least-privilege access and continuous identity verification.
- Insider threats (malicious or accidental): Restrict access strictly to what users and devices need, minimizing damage from misuse or errors.
- Lack of visibility into users and devices: Provides continuous monitoring and context-aware access decisions across users, devices, and workloads.
- Inconsistent security across environments: Applies uniform security policies across on-prem, cloud, and hybrid infrastructures.
- Remote workforce security gaps: Secures access without relying on VPNs, reducing risk from unmanaged or compromised endpoints.
- Slow breach detection and response: Enables real-time policy enforcement and rapid isolation of compromised identities or devices.
- Compliance and audit challenges: Simplifies meeting regulatory requirements through strong access controls, logging, and continuous verification.
- Dependence on perimeter-based security models: Eliminates the assumption that anything inside the network is trustworthy, aligning security with modern threat landscapes.
In this article, we’re going to review the best Zero Trust vendors in the market. Hopefully, this will help you choose the right solution for your business.
Our list of the best Zero Trust Security Vendors
Based on our independent research, defined selection criteria, and evaluation methodology, here are our top zero-trust vendors:
- ThreatLocker EDITOR’S CHOICE A Zero Trust security platform focused on prevention through deny-by-default controls across applications, networks, and endpoints. Get a 30-day free trial.
- Check Point SASE (FREE TRIAL) Offers SASE, secure remote access, and advanced threat prevention with emphasis on integrated security management. Start a 30-day free trial.
- Twingate (FREE TRIAL) A Zero Trust Network Access platform that replaces traditional VPNs with identity- and context-based access to private resources. Start a 14-day free trial.
- NordLayer (GET DEMO) A cloud-based network security platform that delivers Zero Trust access and secure connectivity for modern, distributed workforces. Request a demo.
- Zscaler Focuses on secure application access, threat prevention, and data protection delivered through its global cloud platform.
- Palo Alto Networks Provides broad Zero Trust coverage across cloud, network, and endpoint with strong threat intelligence and unified management.
- Forcepoint Focuses on data-centric Zero Trust. Provides Secure Web Gateway, Data Loss Prevention, and behavioral analytics.
- Cisco Uses its Duo (identity), Umbrella (DNS/security), and Secure Access solutions for Zero Trust. Strong in networking and enterprise security integration, appealing to organizations with existing Cisco infrastructure.
- Netskope Strong in SSE / CASB / cloud data protection. Good visibility and control of cloud apps and data.
If you need to know more, explore our vendor highlight section just below, or skip to our detailed vendor reviews.
Βest zero trust security vendors highlights
Top Feature
Zero Trust allowlisting blocks all software unless explicitly approved
Price
Negotiated pricing
Target Market
Organizations seeking a Zero Trust approach to application and endpoint control
Free Trial Length
30-day free trial
Additional Benefits:
- Deny by default permits only approved applications to run
- Blocks malware and ransomware by default
- One allowlist can be shared across multiple endpoints
- Cloud service with guided agent deployment is easy to set up
Features:
- Policy engine enforces allowlisting and time based rules
- Learning Mode builds allowlists from observed behavior
- Applies access controls for specific IP addresses and USB devices
- Part of a broader platform of security services
- Protects applications wherever hosted on premises or in the cloud
Top Feature
Unified SASE with native Zero Trust enforcement
Price
Negotiated pricing
Target Market
Large enterprises needing Zero Trust across cloud and distributed teams
Free Trial Length
30-day free trial
Read more ▼
Top Feature
Identity and context-based ZTNA for VPN replacement
Price
Free Starter plan, paid plans start at $5 per user per month
Target Market
Organizations replacing legacy VPNs with Zero Trust
Free Trial Length
14-day free trial
Read more ▼
Top Feature
Cloud-based ZTNA with secure remote connectivity
Price
Starts at $8 per user per month
Target Market
SMBs and distributed enterprises needing secure remote access
Free Trial Length
14-day money-back guarantee
Read more ▼
Top Feature
Cloud-native Zero Trust Exchange for app-level access
Price
Negotiated pricing
Target Market
Mid-to-large organizations replacing VPNs in cloud-heavy environments
Free Trial Length
Demo available upon request, duration not disclosed by the vendor
Read more ▼
Top Feature
ZTNA 2.0 with Prisma Access and SASE integration
Price
Negotiated pricing
Target Market
Mid-to-large organizations with hybrid or multi-cloud infrastructure
Free Trial Length
Demo available upon request, duration not disclosed by the vendor
Read more ▼
Top Feature
Data-centric Zero Trust with integrated DLP and ZTNA
Price
Negotiated pricing
Target Market
Mid-sized to large enterprises with hybrid or distributed workforces
Free Trial Length
Free trial available, duration not disclosed by the vendor
Read more ▼
Top Feature
Cisco Zero Trust framework with Duo identity and device verification
Price
Duo free tier up to 10 users, paid plans start at $3 per user per month
Target Market
Mid-to-large enterprises already using Cisco infrastructure
Free Trial Length
30-day free trial
Read more ▼
Top Feature
Identity and context-aware ZTNA for cloud-first Zero Trust
Price
Negotiated pricing
Target Market
Cloud-heavy organizations with distributed or hybrid workforces
Free Trial Length
14-day free trial
Read more ▼
Key points to consider before purchasing a Zero Trust Security Vendor
Here are the key factors you should keep in mind when choosing a zero-trust platform:
- The scope of zero trust: Encompasses identity, device posture, network, applications, and data, all of which matter. Vendors differ in which of these they cover well.
- Deployment model & infrastructure: Cloud-native vs. hybrid vs. on-premises; global presence (for latency); edge points of presence.
- Integration: With your existing IAM, endpoint protection, cloud providers, WAN/SASE, logging/SIEM.
- Cost & licensing: Upfront and recurring. Per-user, per-bandwidth, per feature. Hidden costs (agents, throughput, inspection).
- Performance & latency: Especially for remote users. Evaluate real-world tests if possible.
- Security features: Microsegmentation, DLP, continuous monitoring, least-privilege enforcement, ability to inspect encrypted traffic, and anomaly & behavior detection.
- Support & ecosystem: Training, support, community, and partner network.
To dive deeper into how we incorporate these into our research and review methodology, skip to our detailed methodology section.
The best Zero Trust Security Vendors
1. ThreatLocker (FREE TRIAL)
Best For: Organizations that want to stop threats before they can execute or spread.
Price: Negotiated pricing; 30-day free trial available.
ThreatLocker is a cybersecurity vendor that offers a Zero Trust security platform. The company was founded in 2017 with a mission to build a proactive Zero Trust cybersecurity platform.
ThreatLocker delivers cybersecurity solutions built on Zero Trust principles, including application allowlisting, Ringfencing, network control, storage control, and other measures that block everything not explicitly trusted.
Its Zero Trust model (deny-by-default, allow-by-exception) focuses on preventing threats before they run, a strategy endorsed by modern security frameworks and favored over traditional reactive tools.
Key Features:
- Application Allowlisting: Only explicitly approved applications, scripts, and executables are permitted to run. Everything else is blocked by default.
- Ringfencing Application Containment: Once an application is allowed to run, Ringfencing defines what that software can do. It restricts how apps interact with files, networks, registries, and other programs.
- Network Control: A cloud-managed endpoint and server firewall with dynamic access control lists (ACLs) that control inbound traffic by IP, keywords, or policies.
- Elevation Control: This feature removes local admin privileges from users while still allowing specific applications to run with elevated rights when needed.
- Storage Control: Provides granular policy-based control over storage devices (USB drives, network shares, local drives), defining who, what, and how data is accessed or copied
- ThreatLocker Detect: Monitors for suspicious activity and potential vulnerabilities, alerts administrators, and can automatically trigger protective responses.
- Unified Zero Trust Framework: ThreatLocker’s security controls do not operate as isolated tools, but as a single, coordinated platform
Unique Buying Proposition
ThreatLocker’s unique buying proposition is its ability to deliver true, prevention-first Zero Trust through unified, deny-by-default control across the entire attack surface. It shifts cybersecurity from reactive detection to proactive control.
That conclusion stems from our examination of ThreatLocker’s architecture, how its controls behave in real environments, and how that differs from most “Zero Trust” offerings on the market. Our findings show that its unique value comes from stopping threats by default, tightly controlling trusted apps, protecting all parts of your system, and being built around real-world attack scenarios.
Feature-In-Focus: Application allowlisting with Ringfencing
ThreatLocker positions Application Allowlisting with Ringfencing as the core and foundational feature of its Zero Trust platform. The company repeatedly emphasizes it in product descriptions, demos, and marketing materials as the “first line of defense” and the feature that differentiates them from traditional antivirus or other Zero Trust offerings.
Why do we recommend ThreatLocker?
After our thorough review of ThreatLocker, we recommend it as a Zero Trust security platform, given its architectural approach and demonstrated capabilities. The platform enforces a deny-by-default model that restricts execution, network access, privilege elevation, and data movement unless explicitly permitted.
The platform’s unified management, strong focus on least privilege, and practical features such as time-based access and application containment demonstrate a deep understanding of real-world security challenges.
Who is ThreatLocker recommended for?
ThreatLocker targets organizations of all sizes that want a proactive, prevention-first Zero Trust solution. It is especially appealing to MSPs and enterprises that need centralized, enforceable, and auditable security controls.
Pros:
- Prevention-first approach: Uses a deny-by-default model that blocks unapproved execution and stops many threats before they run.
- Least-privilege enforcement: Helps reduce risk by restricting unnecessary privileges and limiting potential attack vectors.
- Visibility and governance: Provides clear audit trails and consistent policy enforcement.
- Adoption and support: Widely used across SMBs and MSP environments, with 24/7 support available to assist deployments.
Cons:
- Learning curve: The deny-by-default model and granular policies may require significant initial configuration and understanding.
The solution is delivered as a cloud-hosted service with centralized policy management. Licensing is typically on a subscription basis, tied to the number of devices or seats you protect. All paid plans require contacting ThreatLocker or a partner to finalize terms.
ThreatLocker offers a 30-day free trial so you can test the whole platform in your own environment. There is no permanent free tier, though some resellers may advertise entry-level pricing.
EDITOR'S CHOICE
ThreatLocker is our top pick for a Zero Trust security vendor because it focuses on preventing threats before they can execute or spread. Its deny-by-default model blocks unapproved applications, scripts, and executables, while Ringfencing controls what approved applications are allowed to do once they run. The platform also extends control across network access, privilege elevation, storage access, and suspicious activity monitoring, giving administrators a unified way to enforce least privilege and reduce unnecessary exposure. This prevention-first approach, combined with centralized policy management and clear audit trails, makes ThreatLocker a strong choice for organizations that want enforceable Zero Trust controls across endpoints and servers.
Download: 30-day FREE Trial
Official Site: https://www.threatlocker.com/try-threatlocker
OS: Cloud-based
2. Check Point’s SASE (FREE TRIAL)
Apps Available:
- PC
- Mac
- IOS
- Android
- Linux
Website: www.sase.checkpoint.com
Money-back guarantee: 30 DAYS
Best For: Large enterprises that need zero-trust security across cloud environments and distributed teams.
Price: Negotiated pricing; 30-day free trial available.
Check Point is a cybersecurity vendor founded in 1993 and headquartered in Tel Aviv, Israel. It was one of the pioneers of network firewalls and remains a major player in enterprise security.
Check Point’s Infinity Architecture is its unified cybersecurity platform that integrates security across networks, cloud, endpoints, and mobile devices under one management framework. Check Point delivers its Zero Trust security through the Infinity Architecture. The architecture applies the Zero Trust principle across all its security layers: Network, Cloud, Endpoint/Mobile, and Centralized Management.
In 2023, Check Point acquired Perimeter 81, a cloud security company that develops secure remote networks based on the zero-trust architecture. Check Point said the acquisition was intended to strengthen its SASE and Zero Trust capabilities. Perimeter 81 added cloud-native security, quick deployment, full-mesh connectivity, and remote access tools. This strengthened Infinity Architecture for remote work and cloud security.
Key Features:
- Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA): Application-level secure remote access, verifying identity, device posture, and context before granting access.
- Segmentation & Least Privilege Controls: Fine-grained enforcement of what users/devices can access, splitting networks and workloads, so breaches are contained.
- Centralized / Unified Management: Single interface (“single pane of glass”) for managing policies across endpoint, network, cloud, and hybrid environments.
- Continuous Monitoring / AI & Behavioral Analytics: Ongoing verification of trust, device, and user behavior, risk posture, anomaly detection.
- Multi-environment support: Cloud, on-premises, and hybrid deployments are supported, along with options for agentless access to unmanaged devices.
- Data protection: Controls for data movement, encryption, and enforcing least privileges for data access.
Unique Buying Proposition
Check Point’s unique buying proposition as a Zero Trust security vendor is its prevention-first (block attacks before they can cause damage), unified platform approach.
Through its Infinity Architecture, it integrates ZTNA, segmentation, advanced threat prevention, endpoint security, and cloud protection into a single, managed system, accessible from a single console. The acquisition of Perimeter 81 strengthened its ability to deliver cloud-native SASE and Zero Trust services quickly and at scale.
Feature-In-Focus: Unified SASE with Native Zero Trust Enforcement
Unified SASE with Native Zero Trust Enforcement means using one cloud-based security platform to securely connect users to applications without trusting anyone by default. It checks who the user is, the health of their device, and the level of risk each time they try to connect.
This feature helps customers achieve true Zero Trust by granting users access only to the specific applications they need, continuously verifying trust, and blocking threats in real time.
Why do we recommend Check Point SASE?
We recommend Check Point as a Zero Trust security platform due to its long-standing expertise in cybersecurity and its commitment to innovation. As one of the pioneers of network firewalls and a multinational company active in over 60 countries, Check Point protects more than 100,000 organizations worldwide. The company backs its products with dedicated threat research and global partnerships, including the World Economic Forum.
Check Point’s Infinity Architecture brings security together across endpoints, networks, the cloud, and mobile devices, all managed through AI-driven prevention and a single console. With the acquisition of Perimeter 81, it has strengthened its Zero Trust and SASE capabilities to better support today’s hybrid work and cloud environments. Backed by decades of experience and a global presence, Check Point offers enterprises a trusted and future-ready choice for building a comprehensive Zero Trust strategy.
Who is Check Point SASE recommended for?
We recommend Check Point as a Zero Trust security vendor for large enterprises and upper mid-market organizations that need broad, prevention-focused protection across multi-cloud infrastructures or distributed workforces.
Pros:
- Proactive Threat Prevention: Emphasis on blocking threats before they cause harm, powered by AI-driven threat intelligence from Check Point Research.
- Comprehensive Zero Trust Coverage: Supports Zero Trust principles across on-prem, cloud, hybrid, and mobile environments.
- Proven Global Scale and Stability: Active in 60+ countries and protecting over 100,000 organizations, demonstrating enterprise-grade reliability and support.
- Industry Recognition: Named a Leader in Forrester’s 2025 Wave for Zero Trust platforms, highlighting segmentation, least-privilege enforcement, and usability.
Cons:
- Deployment and Management Complexity: Implementation and ongoing operations can be challenging without experienced security teams.
Check Point does not have a publicly listed “starting price” on their website. Licensing is subscription-based, with options to pay annually (typical) or monthly (via certain SKUs or partners). Exact billing terms depend on the partner or reseller agreement.
The service runs in the cloud with centralized management through the Check Point Infinity Portal. There is no standalone on-prem deployment for the SASE service itself. Customers must contact Check Point or a partner to purchase licenses and support. Pricing and available tiers vary by region, number of users, and selected service roles. Check Point provides a 30-day SASE trial, and buyers can also request a demo before finalizing licensing.
SOLID ZERO-TRUST SECURITY VENDOR:Check Point's SASE is built for organizations that need secure remote access, SASE, and Zero Trust controls across distributed environments.
3. Twingate (FREE TRIAL)
Apps Available:
- Mac
- IOS
- Android
- Linux
Website: www.twingate.com
Best For: Organization looking to replace legacy VPNs with a Zero Trust solution.
Price: Free Starter plan for up to 5 users; paid plans start at $5 per user/month when billed annually.
Twingate is a Zero Trust security platform focused on Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA). Twingate was founded in 2019 to address a specific cybersecurity gap. This gap existed because traditional remote access solutions, such as VPNs, provided broad network access, were challenging to manage, and did not meet the security needs of modern, distributed workforces.
Twingate’s solution is built around Zero Trust principles-never trusting network location by default, continuously verifying identity and device context, and granting least-privilege access only after verification.
It creates secure, encrypted connections between users and specific resources, such as servers, applications, and cloud services, without opening broad network access or relying on traditional VPN gateways.
Key aspects that confirm its Zero Trust nature include identity-based authentication, granular access policies, device posture checks, and the secure software-defined perimeter model.
Key Features:
- Identity-Based Access: Provides granular, least-privilege access for users, devices, services, and AI agents, deployable in minutes and scalable across all resources.
- Device and Context Awareness: Access decisions are based on device posture, user identity, resource type, and contextual factors.
- Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA): Remote access to office networks, cloud VPCs, and private resources with automated, network-layer access controls.
- High Performance: Direct-to-resource connectivity without tunnels or bottlenecks, fully cloud-agnostic.
- Simple Administration: Intuitive admin console with a single, customizable policy engine and integration with major identity and security suites.
- Internet Security & Threat Protection: Blocks malicious websites, inappropriate content, and risky domains using DNS filtering, threat intelligence feeds, and protections against cryptojacking and typo squatting.
- Additional Security Controls: Features such as default policies, auto-lock, tagging, and resource management simplify enforcement and governance.
Unique Buying Proposition
Twingate’s unique buying proposition lies in its modern ZTNA approach, which replaces traditional VPNs with identity‑ and context‑based access to resources. Its solution verifies every access request based on strict identity checks, device posture, and contextual factors, then grants least‑privilege access only to the specific resources needed.
This minimizes the attack surface and lateral movement risk and improves performance and user experience across hybrid and cloud environments. Twingate’s platform integrates with existing identity providers and role‑based policies. These characteristics are documented in Twingate’s product descriptions and differentiated from traditional perimeter‑based remote access solutions.
Feature-In-Focus: Identity- and Context-based Access Control
Twingate verifies each user, device, and session before allowing access to specific resources. This includes checking device posture, user identity, and contextual factors such as location or network security.
The platform then enforces least-privilege access, ensuring that your users and services can access only the resources they are explicitly authorized to use. This focus on granular, verified access at the network layer is what defines Twingate’s approach to Zero Trust and differentiates it from legacy remote access solutions.
Why do we recommend Twingate?
We recommend Twingate over other tools because it offers strong Zero Trust controls, performance, and simplicity in ways that many competitors struggle to achieve simultaneously. Twingate delivers direct-to-resource connectivity without tunnels or bottlenecks. Its cloud-agnostic architecture and integration with existing identity providers help organizations scale across hybrid and distributed environments.
Who is Twingate recommended for?
We recommend Twingate for organizations that need secure, modern remote access. Companies handling sensitive data benefit from least-privilege, identity and context-based access controls.
MSPs can use it to manage multiple client environments efficiently. Twingate is also suitable for any organization looking to replace legacy VPNs with a high-performance, scalable, and easy-to-manage Zero Trust solution. It protects resources without slowing down your users.
Pros:
- Rapid Deployment & Scalability: Rapid deployment and easy scaling across diverse environments.
- User Experience: Transparent user experience with minimal disruption to workflow.
- Cloud Compatibility: Cloud-agnostic solution compatible with multiple platforms and services.
- Least-Privilege Enforcement: Enforces least-privilege access consistently across users, devices, and resources.
- Auditing & Compliance: Supports detailed auditing and forensics for compliance and security investigations.
Cons:
- Administrator Training Required: Administrators may need training to correctly configure identity-based and contextual policies.
Twingate’s pricing starts with a free Starter plan that supports up to 5 users and includes basic remote access. Paid plans are available on a per‑user subscription basis, with the Teams tier around $5 per user/month (when billed annually) and the Business tier around $10 per user/month (when billed annually). Both Teams and Business tiers include a 14‑day free trial so you can evaluate features before committing.
An Enterprise plan with custom pricing is offered for larger organizations with advanced needs. All plans are delivered as a cloud‑hosted service and can be billed monthly or annually.
ZERO TRUST:Twingate is a ZTNA that allows businesses to manage remote access to apps and other resources. Paid plans include a 14-day free trial.
4. NordLayer (GET DEMO)
Apps Available:
- PC
- Mac
- IOS
- Android
- Linux
Website: www.nordlayer.com
Money-back guarantee: 14 DAYS
Best For: SMBs and distributed enterprises that need secure remote access.
Price: Starts at $8 per user/month when billed annually; 5-user minimum; 14-day money-back guarantee.
NordLayer is a cloud-based Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) and secure connectivity platform. It was founded in 2019 (originally as NordVPN Teams) as a business‑focused network security solution. Its goal is to help organizations secure remote and cloud-based access. It also aims to address modern cybersecurity needs and support the shift toward hybrid work models.
The platform adheres to the principle of verify-before-trust access control. It enforces identity-based authentication, assesses device posture, and applies least-privilege access policies, so users can access only the resources they are authorized to use. Access is granted on a per-session basis and continuously evaluated to reduce lateral movement and exposure in the event of compromised credentials.
Key Features:
- Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA): Ensures users and devices are verified before accessing business resources, limiting network exposure and enforcing least-privilege access.
- Device Posture Monitoring: Checks device compliance and blocks risky or noncompliant endpoints before granting access.
- Secure Remote Access & VPN: Provides encrypted connections to corporate resources, with support for business VPN protocols and private gateways.
- Cloud Firewall & Traffic Controls: Provides granular network filtering and segmentation to reduce risk further.
- Integration & Identity Support: Works with identity providers and supports multifactor authentication and single sign-on to streamline secure access
Unique Buying Proposition
NordLayer’s differentiation is that it offers Zero Trust-based secure access that is fast to deploy, easy to manage, and built for modern, distributed teams. It integrates secure remote access, granular access control, and scalable network protection in a way that is fast to deploy and simple to manage.
Feature-In-Focus: Cloud-based ZTNA with Secure Connectivity
Cloud-based ZTNA enables you to securely control who can access your resources, from where, and on which devices. It removes the need to deploy or manage hardware firewalls. This approach simplifies security operations and enables fast onboarding for remote and hybrid teams. It also reduces infrastructure overhead and allows your security posture to scale as your organization grows.
Why do we recommend NordLayer?
We recommend NordLayer because it addresses the modern challenges of securing distributed and hybrid workforces with simplicity and scalability. Its features, such as encrypted connections, device posture checks, dedicated and shared gateways, and cloud firewall segmentation, reduce operational overhead, speed up onboarding, and scale easily as your organization grows.
Who is NordLayer recommended for?
We recommend NordLayer for SMBs and distributed enterprises that need secure remote access, scalable network protection, and simplified management without heavy IT overhead. Industries that benefit most include any organization where secure, user- and device-based access is critical.
Pros:
- User-Friendly Deployment: Easy to set up and manage with a centralized cloud-based control panel that simplifies configuration and policy enforcement.
- Strong Performance: Fast connections and global servers help maintain productivity without significant latency or disruption.
- Scalability: Flexible for businesses of varying sizes, suitable for remote and hybrid workforces.
Cons:
- Minimum User Requirement: Some plans require a minimum number of users, which may limit suitability for very small teams.
NordLayer’s pricing is cloud‑based and subscription‑driven. Pricing starts at $8 per user per month for the Lite plan. Higher tiers, such as Core at $11 per user per month and Premium at $14 per user per month, add more security features and network controls. Plans can be billed monthly or annually, with discounts available for annual commitments.
All subscriptions include a 14‑day money‑back guarantee so you can evaluate the service risk‑free. The platform is delivered entirely as a cloud-native service. Licensing covers secure connectivity, Zero Trust access, and related security services managed through a centralized control panel.
RELIABLE ALL-ROUNDER:Small Enterprise Favourite NordLayer is offered in three plan levels and the top two of these can implement ZTA. Request a demo to see NordLayer in action.
5. Zscaler
Best For: Mid- to large-sized organizations with remote teams, heavy cloud use, and a need to replace old VPNs
Price: Negotiated pricing
Zscaler is an American cloud security company and a leading provider of Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) and Secure Service Edge (SSE). It routes user traffic through its global cloud to enforce identity-based policies before granting access to applications or data.
Zscaler enforces Zero Trust principles at scale for remote, hybrid, and cloud environments using the following approach:
- Never trust, always verify: Access decisions are based on user identity, device posture, and context, not network location.
- Application-level access: Users connect directly to authorized apps, bypassing the network and thereby reducing the risk of lateral movement.
- Micro-segmentation: Each app is isolated, so the compromise of one does not expose others.
- Continuous monitoring: Sessions are re-evaluated in real time with threat inspection and data protection.
- Cloud delivery: Security follows users everywhere, with minimal reliance on corporate VPNs.
Zscaler Private Access (ZPA) is its Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) service for on-premises, public cloud, and data center private applications. The Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is the platform that powers all Zscaler services to securely connect users, devices, and applications over any network. Zscaler was named a Leader in the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Security Service Edge (SSE), for the fourth consecutive year. It was placed the highest on the Ability to Execute axis.
Key Features:
- Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange: Cloud-native Zero Trust Exchange that proxies and inspects traffic in-line, including encrypted traffic.
- ZPA (Zscaler Private Access): Secure remote access to private apps at the application level, not the network level.
- ZIA (Zscaler Internet Access): Secure web gateway with threat prevention, DLP, and SSL inspection.
- Data protection & DLP: Discovery, classification, and policy enforcement for data in use, motion, or at rest in SaaS/cloud.
- Global scalability: Over 150 data centers for low-latency, resilient access worldwide.
Unique Buying Proposition
Zscaler’s unique buying proposition is that it delivers Zero Trust entirely through a cloud-native platform at a global scale. Zscaler connects identities directly to specific applications using policy-based controls, micro-segmentation, and inline threat inspection.
Although these features (identity-based access, micro-segmentation, and inline inspection) are not entirely exclusive to Zscaler, they are notable advantages. The key differentiator is execution at a global scale, as noted by Gartner, and being purpose-built as a Zero Trust cloud platform rather than retrofitted.
Feature-In-Focus: Cloud-native Zero Trust Exchange
Cloud-native Zero Trust Exchange brokers secure, identity and context-aware one-to-one connections between users/devices and applications.
This architecture hides applications from the internet, enforces least-privilege access, and prevents lateral movement. It stops threats and data loss at scale by verifying identity, assessing risk, and enforcing policy before any connection is allowed.
Why do we recommend Zscaler?
We recommend Zscaler because it was purpose-built as a cloud-native Zero Trust platform, rather than adapted from legacy VPN or firewall architectures. Zscaler operates one of the largest global security clouds, with over 150 data centers that deliver low-latency access to distributed workforces.
It also integrates identity-based access control with inline threat prevention, SSL inspection, and data protection in a single service. Our assessment is based on reviewing multiple independent sources, including Gartner’s 2025 Magic Quadrant for SSE, vendor technical documentation, and industry adoption case studies, all of which highlight Zscaler’s execution strength and architectural maturity.
Who is Zscaler recommended for?
Zscaler is best suited for large or mid-sized organizations with distributed workforces, heavy use of SaaS and cloud applications, and a need to replace legacy VPNs with a scalable Zero Trust model.
Pros:
- Advanced Threat Protection: Strong threat protection with inline inspection of encrypted traffic and rapid global deployment of new protections.
- Reduced Attack Surface: Hides applications from the public internet and removes reliance on VPNs, lowering exposure to attacks.
- Improved Remote User Performance: Direct-to-cloud connections reduce latency by avoiding traffic backhauling through data centers.
- Operational Simplicity: Consolidates VPN, secure web gateway (SWG), data loss prevention (DLP), and firewall-like capabilities into a single service.
- High Availability and Resilience: Built with redundancy, failover, and private service edge options to ensure reliable access.
Cons:
- Premium Pricing Model: Feature-based licensing and higher costs compared to simpler or point solutions.
- Complex Initial Setup: Policy configuration and management can have a steep learning curve.
- Potential Latency Overhead: SSL inspection and deep inspection may impact performance in certain regions or workloads.
- Legacy Application Integration Challenges: It is more difficult to connect with some older on-prem applications or systems.
- Client-Side Issues: Occasional performance or stability concerns reported with endpoint clients.
Zscaler pricing and plans are subscription-based and billed per user. Organizations choose cloud-delivered bundles such as the Essentials Platform for basic secure internet and limited private access, or the Zscaler Platform for full SSE/SASE with ZIA, ZPA, and data security. These services are delivered entirely in the cloud, which eliminates the need for on-prem appliances.
Licenses and support are scoped to cloud deployment with centralized management, and customers typically commit to annual contracts. However, exact billing terms and available durations depend on reseller agreements and organizational requirements.
6. Palo Alto Networks
Best For: Mid-to-large organizations that run hybrid or multi-cloud infrastructures
Price: Negotiated pricing
Palo Alto Networks is a well-known American enterprise cybersecurity company that provides network security, cloud security, endpoint protection, and various cloud-delivered security services.
Palo Alto Networks delivers Zero Trust security primarily through its Prisma Access and Prisma SASE platforms, backed by its next-generation firewalls. Access is granted based on identity and context, rather than network location, and security is applied consistently, regardless of whether users are in the office, at home, or on mobile devices.
Palo Alto Networks was named a Leader in the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for SSE and also in the 2025 Magic Quadrant for SASE Platforms. It earned the highest score on Ability to Execute in SASE.
Key Features:
- ZTNA 2.0: Fine-grained access (app & sub-app level), continuous trust verification (user/device/app behavior), constant inspection of allowed traffic, protection of all data, and coverage of all types of apps (cloud, private, legacy).
- App-ID, User-ID, Device-ID: Palo Alto uses these identifiers to enforce precise access control and monitor trust per session.
- Integrated Security Services: URL filtering (including advanced ML-based filtering), DNS security, threat prevention (malware, zero-day), data loss prevention (DLP), CASB, firewalling.
- Deployment flexibility: Supports cloud, hybrid, and on-prem environments; can be managed via Panorama; offers different firewall form factors.
- Strong Analytics, Automation, Threat Intelligence: Machine learning, continuous monitoring, detection of anomalies; shared threat intelligence across NGFWs, Prisma Access, etc.
Unique Buying Proposition
Palo Alto’s unique buying proposition is its tight integration of ZTNA capabilities with its existing firewall and threat intelligence ecosystem (Prisma Access, Cortex, and NGFW). It integrates ZTNA, secure web gateway, CASB, firewalling, and advanced threat intelligence into a single architecture that extends Zero Trust across users, devices, applications, and networks.
If your business already uses Palo Alto’s firewalls, endpoint agents, or threat intelligence tools, adding Prisma Access or Prisma SASE extends those same policies and protections into the cloud and the remote workforce. This does not require you to rebuild everything from scratch. CISOs can enforce the same Zero Trust principles everywhere and reduce tool duplication.
Feature-In-Focus: ZTNA 2.0
The main feature Palo Alto Networks emphasizes in its Zero Trust security platform is ZTNA 2.0, with continuous trust verification and fine‑grained access control.
Palo Alto Networks’ ZTNA 2.0 gives users access only to the specific applications or parts of applications they need. It continuously checks trust by monitoring user behavior, device health, and app activity, and inspects traffic in real time to catch threats.
Why do we recommend Palo Alto Networks?
We recommend Palo Alto as a top Zero Trust security vendor because it consolidates several critical security tools into a single platform. For example, instead of using separate tools for VPN, web security, and cloud app protection, Palo Alto’s Prisma Access provides all three in a single system.
Palo Alto also extends Zero Trust features into its next-generation firewall ecosystem and security operations tools such as Cortex. Customers already using Palo Alto firewalls or threat detection systems can get tighter integration and centralized management without adopting a separate Zero Trust vendor.
Who is Palo Alto Networks recommended for?
Palo Alto’s Zero Trust platform is best suited for large enterprises and upper mid-market organizations that run hybrid or multi-cloud infrastructures, support global or remote workforces, and must meet strict compliance requirements.
It is also suitable for businesses already using Palo Alto firewalls or security tools, since integration provides stronger consistency and centralized management.
Pros:
- Unified Zero Trust Controls: Offers a broad, unified suite of Zero Trust controls rather than requiring many standalone tools.
- Existing Palo Alto Fit: Suitable for organizations that already use Palo Alto NGFWs, as they can reuse policies, threat intelligence, and management tools.
- Strong Visibility: Provides visibility across users, devices, applications, and cloud/on-prem environments, which aids in risk management and compliance.
- Industry Recognition: Recognized by industry analysts such as Gartner and Forrester as a leader in SASE, SSE, and ZTNA-related spaces.
Cons:
- Demanding Implementation: Implementation, configuration, and policy tuning can be demanding.
- Additional Licensing: Some capabilities require extra licensing or add-ons, which may be expensive for smaller organizations.
- Potential Latency: Depending on geography, traffic routing, and inspection load, there can be a latency or throughput hit.
Palo Alto Networks’ ZTNA capabilities are delivered through its cloud‑based Prisma Access SASE service. Pricing is subscription‑based with a variety of editions and tiers depending on features, user count, and service scope.
It is typically billed annually and scoped per user or per network throughput, with optional add‑ons available as separate subscription components. However, there is no publicly posted starting price on the official website.
7. Forcepoint
Best For: Mid-sized to large enterprises with distributed or hybrid workforces
Price: Negotiated pricing
Forcepoint is a U.S.-based cybersecurity firm founded in 1994. It started as a network consulting company called NetPartners. It changed its name to Websense after it shifted focus to web filtering and internet security. Years later, the company was rebranded as Forcepoint after Raytheon acquired Websense and merged it with Stonesoft (firewalls) and its own cyber products. The rebrand reflected the company’s expansion from point solutions such as web filtering into a broader security platform.
Forcepoint formally articulates its Zero Trust strategy through its Forcepoint ONE platform and Security Service Edge (SSE) offering. It promotes ZTNA, DLP, SWG, CASB, and endpoint/device verification as core components. Forcepoint ONE ZTNA enables remote users to securely access only the private applications for which they are authorized, rather than granting full network access. It supports both agent-based and agentless models.
Forcepoint marketing and specification content emphasize least-privilege access, continuous verification, network/app segmentation, control of data flows, and removing implicit trust from devices/identities. These are standard Zero Trust principles.
Key Features:
- Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA): Controls remote access, so users only reach the specific private apps they need.
- Integrated Data Loss Prevention (DLP): Monitors, classifies, and enforces policies on sensitive data across cloud, web, email, network, and endpoints.
- Secure Web Gateway (SWG) + Remote Browser Isolation (RBI): Protects browsing and file downloads by isolating dangerous web content.
- CASB Functionality: Visibility and control over cloud application usage, enforcing policy on cloud-based services.
- Continuous Monitoring & Behavioral Analytics: Detecting risky user behavior patterns, insider threats, device posture, etc.
- Microsegmentation & Least-privilege Enforcement: Limiting lateral movement and restricting permissions to only what’s necessary
Unique Buying Proposition
Based on its own product documentation and analyst reports, Forcepoint’s unique selling point in Zero Trust security is its data-centric security model. Forcepoint builds its platform around protecting sensitive data wherever it moves (cloud apps, endpoints, email, or private networks).
It uses advanced Data Loss Prevention (DLP) integrated directly into its Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), CASB, and Secure Web Gateway services. Although other platforms offer similar functions, Forcepoint differentiates itself by making data protection the foundation of its Zero Trust message rather than one of many features.
Feature-In-Focus: Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)
The main feature Forcepoint emphasizes as a Zero Trust security platform is Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), which provides controlled, VPN-free access to internal and private applications.
Forcepoint positions this ZTNA capability as a core part of its Zero Trust strategy, extending Zero Trust principles to private apps in data centers and private clouds and limiting access based on identity and policy.
Why do we recommend Forcepoint?
Forcepoint has decades of cybersecurity experience and serves thousands of customers globally, which supports its credibility as an established enterprise security vendor.
Its cloud-native platform (Forcepoint ONE) simplifies Zero Trust adoption by unifying web, cloud, and private app security into a single console, which cuts down on operational complexity and speeds up incident response.
Who is Forcepoint recommended for?
Forcepoint Zero Trust security is best suited for organizations that handle sensitive data and need strict control over how it is accessed and used. This includes industries such as finance, healthcare, government, and defense, where data leaks or insider threats can result in significant reputational damage.
Pros:
- Integrated Data Loss Prevention: Built-in DLP across web, email, and endpoints provides stronger control over data leaks.
- Comprehensive Remote User Security: ZTNA, CASB, and Remote Browser Isolation (RBI) secure remote users, BYOD, and multiple device types.
- Proactive Risk Detection: Behavioral analytics help detect risky user behavior early, not just after policy violations occur.
Cons:
- Configuration Complexity: Granular DLP policies, behavioral analytics, and integrated controls require careful tuning and skilled expertise.
- Higher Cost for Full Suite: Licensing and maintenance costs can be high when deploying the complete set of capabilities (ZTNA, CASB, DLP, SWG, RBI).
Forcepoint products, including ZTNA, are cloud-delivered as part of the Forcepoint ONE platform, with annual subscription-based licensing and support included at least at a basic level, with options for enhanced support. Exact pricing details are based on request.
There is no permanent free tier, but Forcepoint does offer free trial and demo options upon request through its website for many cloud products to allow evaluation before purchase.
8. Cisco
Best For: Mid-to-large enterprises that already run Cisco networking or security infrastructure.
Price: Cisco Duo has a free tier for up to 10 users; paid Duo plans start at $3 per user/month. Other Cisco Zero Trust components are licensed separately.
Cisco delivers Zero Trust through a mix of identity, device, and network controls integrated into its broader security and networking portfolio. Cisco’s approach is often described as a Zero Trust framework. It is called a Zero Trust framework because it does not rely on a single product or technology.
It spans multiple layers of security that work together: users, devices, networks, and applications. Together, these layers form a Zero Trust fabric where no user, device, or app is trusted by default, and each access request is continuously validated.
In fact, Cisco’s own Zero Trust Framework guide breaks its model into three pillars: User & Device Security, Network & Cloud Security, and Application & Data Security. It explicitly states that Zero Trust is not a single product but a coordinated set of controls.
So, as a potential buyer, you should not expect to purchase a single “Zero Trust product” from Cisco. You must evaluate how Cisco’s portfolio, such as Duo (identity), ISE (device checks), and Umbrella (cloud security), can be deployed together to form a Zero Trust fabric. This provides wide coverage, but may require more integration and planning than a single, all-in-one service.
Key Features:
- ZTNA via Cisco Duo: Provides secure access to applications by verifying user identity and device trust before granting entry.
- Device Posture and Identity Verification with Cisco ISE: Checks the compliance and security posture of devices connecting to the network.
- Workload Protection: Secure workload (Tetration) for microsegmentation and workload protection segments applications and workloads in data centers and cloud environments.
- Umbrella for Cloud Security: Protects users and devices from internet threats and cloud applications by filtering DNS requests, blocking malicious domains, and enforcing secure web access.
- Continuous Verification: Behavioral analytics and least-privilege enforcement monitor user and device activity in real time, applying adaptive policies to minimize risk and ensure access is limited to only what is necessary.
Unique Buying Proposition
Cisco is best known for its networking infrastructure, including switches, routers, and wireless systems, which most enterprises widely use. Its Zero Trust approach is built into this foundation, something most vendors cannot match.
For example, Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) can enforce Zero Trust policies at the network level by controlling which devices are allowed to connect. Duo verifies user identity, Umbrella protects cloud access, and Secure Workload enforces microsegmentation in data centers. Cisco’s advantage is that it builds Zero Trust policies directly into the very networks and connections employees use every day.
Feature-In-Focus: Identity and Device-centric Verification
Cisco’s Zero Trust strategy focuses on verifying who and what is connecting, continuously assessing device compliance and user identity before granting access, and enforcing least-privilege policies.
This trusted identity foundation is supported by workload protection (microsegmentation with Tetration) and cloud security (Umbrella), but the core Zero Trust emphasis in Cisco’s sites centers on continuous verification of identity and device posture to dynamically control access.
Why do we recommend Cisco?
Cisco earns a place among the top Zero Trust vendors because of the maturity and depth of its security portfolio, reinforced by decades of leadership in enterprise networking. Cisco has a proven record of operating at massive scale, with its technologies embedded in the backbone of global businesses for years.
Its long experience gives it the know-how to deliver Zero Trust in complex, hybrid environments where some systems cannot fully move to the cloud. Its tools for identity, device checks, segmentation, and threat defense have been tested and improved through years of global use.
Who is Cisco recommended for?
Cisco Zero Trust is best suited for large enterprises and mid-sized organizations that already run Cisco networking or security infrastructure and need to extend Zero Trust across complex, hybrid environments. It works well in ecosystems where on-premises networks, cloud workloads, and SaaS applications need to be secured under a single framework.
Companies in sectors such as finance, healthcare, government, and manufacturing are the primary target market. Cisco’s approach is less about quick deployment for small businesses and more about giving enterprises consistent security across users, devices, and networks at scale.
Pros:
- Established vendor credibility: Decades of leadership in networking and enterprise IT give trust in stability and scalability.
- Proven at large scale: Successfully deployed in complex, hybrid, and global environments.
- Unified ecosystem: Works well for organizations already invested in Cisco networking gear, reducing integration friction.
- Strong support and training: Extensive Cisco documentation, certifications, and global support infrastructure.
Cons:
- Higher cost: Enterprise-scale licensing and integration can be expensive.
- Integration effort: Organizations with non-Cisco networks may face interoperability challenges.
- Learning curve: Security teams may require training to manage and optimize multiple tools effectively.
Cisco’s Zero Trust capabilities, particularly Cisco Duo for ZTNA and identity/security verification, offer tiered subscription pricing. There is a free tier for up to 10 users. Paid plans start at $3 per user per month for the Essentials edition, $6 per user per month for the Advantage edition, and $9 per user per month for the Premier edition when billed monthly.
Cisco offers a 30-day free trial of Duo’s Zero Trust access capabilities so you can evaluate before purchasing. Additional Zero Trust components, such as Cisco ISE, Umbrella, and Tetration, have separate licensing and are also delivered as cloud or hybrid services with subscription-based billing.
9. Netskope
Best For: Organizations that are heavily invested in cloud services and have a distributed or hybrid workforce.
Price: Negotiated pricing
Netskope is a U.S.-based cybersecurity company specializing in cloud security, SASE (Secure Access Service Edge), CASB (Cloud Access Security Broker), and data protection. As a Zero Trust security vendor, Netskope adheres to the core principles of Zero Trust. It uses ZTNA to restrict access to approved cloud or private applications based on identity, device, location, and risk.
Netskope’s product resources describe how its cloud-native platform secures SaaS, IaaS, and web traffic without relying on traditional network perimeters. Netskope continuously monitors data movement, enforces least-privilege access, and applies granular policies to protect sensitive information.
Key Features:
- Netskope One / Intelligent SSE: Unified platform combining SWG, CASB, ZTNA, DLP, threat protection, and cloud firewall.
- ZTNA / Private Access: Controls who can access internal or private apps based on identity, device, context (location, risk), and ensures only authorized access.
- Cloud-native architecture (NewEdge network): Provides low-latency global access by locating SSE services close to users and cloud apps; less dependence on backhauling or centralized infrastructure.
- Data Loss Prevention (DLP) / CASB / Inline & Out-of-band control: Monitors data at rest, in use, in motion; enforces policies on file sharing, cloud app usage, web traffic; helps prevent data leaks.
- Behavioral analytics, monitoring & adaptive policies: Detects unusual user or app behavior; uses analytics to adjust trust levels or revoke access when risk increases.
Unique Buying Proposition
Netskope emphasizes integrated data protection and granular policy controls across SaaS, IaaS, and web traffic. It brings together ZTNA, CASB, DLP, and threat detection functions into a single platform. Bringing these functions into a single platform enables security teams to establish consistent policies across the entire organization, identify risks more quickly, and reduce the likelihood of attackers slipping through the cracks.
As of 2025, Netskope continues to be recognized as a top Zero Trust and cloud security vendor. Gartner named it a Leader in both the Magic Quadrant for SASE Platforms and the Magic Quadrant for SSE. In Gartner’s Critical Capabilities for SASE, Netskope ranked first in three out of four key use cases, including Zero Trust SASE.
This consistent recognition demonstrates Netskope’s competitive advantage in unifying cloud-native access, data security, and Zero Trust into a single platform. It was also named a Leader in the IDC MarketScape for DLP.
Feature-In-Focus: Identity-and Context-aware ZTNA
Netskope’s feature-in-focus as a Zero Trust security platform is its identity and context-aware ZTNA within the unified Netskope One/Intelligent SSE platform. Netskope’s Zero Trust focus centers on controlling access to internal or private applications based on user identity, device posture, location, and risk context. As a customer, the value you derive from this feature is secure access that allows only authorized users and devices to access the right applications.
Why do we recommend Netskope?
We recommend Netskope as a Zero Trust platform because it is purpose-built for today’s cloud-first, hybrid workforce. It focuses on securing SaaS, IaaS, and web traffic directly in the cloud, where most business data and user activity now reside.
Who is Netskope recommended for?
Netskope is recommended for organizations that are heavily invested in cloud services and have a distributed or hybrid workforce.
Companies undergoing digital transformation or transitioning away from legacy VPNs and perimeter-based security benefit the most, as Netskope is designed to protect data, apps, and users directly in the cloud.
Pros:
- Strong SaaS and Cloud Visibility: CASB and DLP provide deep insight into cloud app usage and effective control over data and shadow IT.
- Platform Consolidation: Combines multiple Zero Trust and SASE capabilities into a single console and agent, reducing tool sprawl.
- High Cloud Performance: NewEdge infrastructure delivers strong performance for remote and distributed users.
- Enterprise Scalability: Designed to support large enterprises, high user counts, and complex multi-cloud environments.
Cons:
- Higher Cost Structure: Pricing and total cost of ownership may be prohibitive for smaller organizations.
- Deployment and Integration Complexity: ZTNA policy setup, legacy app integration, and networking configuration require skilled expertise.
- Traffic Inspection Limitations: Limited inspection for some non-web or non-HTTP/S traffic and potential throughput constraints with certain tunnel types.
Netskope does not publish a simple starting price for the reviewed platform on the official product pages checked here. Netskope routes buyers through demo and contact forms, and Netskope One Private Access includes a free 14-day test-drive route. Final pricing depends on the selected Netskope products, package scope, user count, and contract terms.
Our Methodology for Choosing the Best Zero Trust Security Platforms
- Comprehensive Research: We examined analyst reports, vendor documentation, white papers, and case studies to assess each platform’s strengths and weaknesses.
- Practical and Strategic Factors: Evaluated deployment models (cloud-native vs. retrofitted), integration breadth (ZTNA, CASB, SWG, DLP), scalability, adoption maturity, and vendor track record.
- Peer and Customer Feedback: Reviewed real-world experiences, testimonials, and operational challenges that are often overlooked in marketing materials.
- Pilot Testing: Solutions were tested in real-world pilot environments with actual users to evaluate performance, ease of management, and overall usability.
- Balanced Comparison: We integrated findings from research, analyst reports, vendor documentation, peer feedback, and pilot testing to make fair comparisons.
- Capabilities and Operational Effectiveness: We identified and highlighted the features and performance factors that set each Zero Trust platform apart.
Broader B2B Software Selection Methodology
We evaluate B2B software using a consistent, objective framework that focuses on how well a product solves meaningful business problems at a justified cost. This includes assessing overall performance, scalability, stability, and user experience quality.
We examine real-world feedback from practitioners to understand how the software behaves outside controlled demos. We also review vendor transparency, roadmap clarity, support responsiveness, and the pace at which meaningful improvements are released. We follow this approach to ensure each of our recommendations is grounded in practical value, long-term viability, and operational impact, not in marketing claims.
Check out our detailed B2B software methodology page to learn more.
Why Trust Us?
Our work is produced by a team of IT and business software professionals with extensive hands-on experience evaluating, deploying, and managing enterprise technology. We analyze software independently, using evidence-based methods and industry best practices to ensure our assessments remain unbiased and technically sound.
Our goal is to provide you with clear, reliable insights that help reduce risk, shorten evaluation cycles, and support confident decision-making when selecting complex business technology.