Cord Cutting Statistics and Trends in 2021

“Cord-cutting” is a fast-growing trend among US residents. It involves “cutting the cord” on high-cost pay-TV options, including cable TV and satellite TV. Cord cutters aren’t ditching TV altogether. Instead, they’re shifting to lower-cost online streaming options, like on-demand giant Netflix and Google’s YouTube TV for live streaming access to cable TV and broadcast networks. Although cord-cutting is still in its infancy compared to traditional methods for viewing content, its rapid and expanding growth in the past several years means there are plenty of cord-cutting stats and trends available in 2021. Here are the most startling and most interesting cord-cutting facts for the current year and beyond. 

1. Major Cable Providers Collectively Lost Around 7 Million Pay-TV Subscribers in 2020

Cord-cutting is responsible for leading cable TV providers losing millions of customers they can’t seem to win back. In fact, traditional pay-TV providers lost nearly 7 million subscribers in 2020 alone (some other estimates put it at just over 5 million). Notably, the pandemic-driven 2020 subscriber bleed was boosted, in part, by disgruntled sports fans dropping cable due to a lack of sports, as well as negative economic impacts forcing many families and individuals to cut costs.

In total, major US cable TV and satellite TV have lost over 30 million subscribers since 2012. Most cord-cutters are not just ditching live TV for all on-demand, however. The majority are instead moving to all-digital live TV streaming services, such as Sling TV, YouTube TV, fuboTV,  and Hulu + Live TV. 

The largest traditional cable TV providers experiencing subscriber losses include:

  • Comcast: This company had 22.3 million video customers by year-end 2017. At the end of 2018, that number was down to 21.9 million. By the end of 2020, the company’s pay-tv subscriber numbers dipped below 19 million. In fact, the company lost over 200,000 subscribers in Q4 2020 alone. 
  • Verizon: Subscriber numbers for this company have decreased every quarter since Q4 2016. The company lost nearly 280,000 cable TV subscribers in 2020. 
  • Charter: This organization is now losing tens of thousands of video customers each year. Its CEO blames higher carriage fees imposed by programmers as a key trigger for customers who are moving on to cord-cutting services. Still, Charter was a bit of an oddball in 2020. It managed to add over 100,000 cable TV subscribers in Q2 2020, and 67,000 in Q3 2020. It lost about 66,000 pay-TV customers in Q4 2020.
  • DirecTV (satellite): This AT&T-owned company lost over 2.3 million satellite TV subscribers between 2017 and 2019. And then 2020 happened, which saw over 3 million DirecTV subscribers walk away. 
  • Dish Network: The second-largest cable TV provider in the US also saw its customer share dip in 2020. Dish Network lost 408,000 satellite customers in 2020. Interestingly, the company’s Sling TV service, which was one of the first cord-cutting live TV services on the market, also last over 100,000 subscribers.

This bloodletting is expected to continue unabated for the time being. Even Comcast—which has experienced unquestionably the largest loss of cable TV subscribers of the bunch—is not optimistic about its pay-TV prospects. The company predicts it will see even more of its customers dropping its traditional cable TV packages this year. 

Many Americans still maintain both traditional TV and cord-cutting services, however. As of 2019, 43% of Americans had both pay-TV and streaming video-on-demand (SVOD) subscriptions.

2. The average monthly cable TV bill is now over $200 per month

According to the FCC’s 2018 Report on Cable Industry Pricing (the latest as of this time of writing), the average cost of expanded basic cable services was just over $73.08. That number, however, does not include the cost to purchase or rent equipment from cable TV providers, nor does it include the cost of taxes and fees. The FCC releases this report every two years, so new values for 2020 data should be coming sometime in 2021.

If a 2018 Consumer Reports study is any indication, the FCC’s numbers are way off. Consumer Reports found that the average monthly cable TV bill was over $217, which included the average package cost (over $156), government fees and taxes, company-imposed fees, and the cost of premium serves added to the package.

cord cutting pay tv cost breakdown
Source: Consumer Reports

Many cord cutters instead opt for a live TV streaming service, such as YouTube TV, Hulu with Live TV, or Sling TV, which cost a fraction of that and don’t come with the added fees.

3. Traditional cable TV price increases are slowing down

Our analysis of FCC expanded basic cable pricing data (up to 2016, the most recent data available from the FCC), indicates that traditional cable companies are still increasing prices each year, but doing so with smaller percentages than in the earlier just a decade ago.

fcc cable pricing data

After 2012, traditional cable TV providers dramatically slowed down their pace of price increases. And with the exception of 2012, year-over-year price increases have been going down. There may be many factors influencing this, but technological advances (going digital) are likely bringing down the cost to deliver services. Additionally, competition from cord-cutting services is likely forcing price competition for traditional cable TV providers.

4. 2009 was the absolute worst year for traditional cable TV subscribers

A combination of price increases and decreasing wages led to 2009 being the worst year in the 2000s for cable TV subscribers.

Riding on the downwind of the housing market crash, there was a 7 percentage point gap between wage increases (negative 1.5%) and expanded basic cable price increases (5.5%). It wasn’t the only year with a huge gap (2002 saw a 6.9 percentage point gap, for example), but it was the only year where that gap was highlighted by wage decreases, versus just smaller percentages of wage growth.

Wage increase vs Cable increase US

As expected, we witnessed similar issues with inflation. There was a 6.9 percentage point spread between price increases and inflation in 2009 (and a 6.3 percentage point spread in 2002).

US Inflation vs Cable price


Wages and price increase percentages tend to be much closer together year-over-year. However, there is a promising trend we’ve seen happening with inflation, wages, and expanded basic cable price increases: the gap is tightening up each year.

Again, this is expected given wages and inflation are tied, but there are two takeaways as well, one negative, one positive.

Negative: Inflation and US wages always fall well behind traditional price increases. As such, Americans putting an ever-increasing share of their wages toward traditional cable TV. As of 2016 (the most recent year for FCC data on average cable prices), that was nearly 2%.

Positive: The gap between inflation/wages and price increases is decreasing overall. Outliers like 2009 exist, but the overall average spread is declining. If trends continue, the average gap between price increases and wage/inflation increases could be around 0.6%.

5. Over 65% of cord-cutters want free or reduced-cost ad-supported services

Traditional pay-TV has always been driven by ads, but with more options, ad-hating cord-cutters are starting to see themselves out. A large majority (70 percent) of consumers believe 20 minutes of ads for a program one hour in length is too many. A further 82 percent very much dislike seeing the same ads over and over again. Overall, 8 minutes of ads appear to be enough to keep pay-TV subscribers from ditching solely on ads, while 16 minutes of ads is a breaking point for many.

Cord cutting statistics deloitte
Source: Deloitte

However, that’s not the whole story. In its COVID-era “Digital media trends survey, 14th edition”, Deloitte also discovered a bit of a new trend emerging. It seems that cord-cutters also like and want services that are free with ads. In fact, 43% of cord-cutters would use a service that’s ad-only (no subscription fee), while 22% would use a service that’s reduced cost ($6/month) and carries some ads.

cord-cutting stats and facts deloitte survey

6. Live TV services are quickly adding subscribers

As subscribers abandon their traditional pay-TV providers, they’re now going into the open arms of live TV streaming services. Whether you call them “IPTV” (though that term is more regularly applied to illegal live TV streaming options) or Virtual Multichannel Video Providers (vMVPDs), there are now a handful of internet-based services on the market designed to replace cable and satellite TV. 

Subscriber counts for the most-used cable TV replacers include:

  • YouTube TV: Over 3 million subscribers as of Q1 2021 (an increase of ~1 million since 2019)
  • Hulu + Live TV: Over 4 million(pdf) subscribers Q1 2021 (an increase of ~1 million since 2019)
  • Sling TV: Over 2.47 million subscribers as of Q1 2021 (a decrease of ~130,000 since 2019)
  • FuboTV: Over 547,000  subscribers as of Q1 2021(an increase of ~300,000)
  • Philo: Over 800,000 subscribers as of Q1 2021 (an increase of ~750,000 since 2018)
  • AT&T TV: Around 656,000 subscribers as of early 2020 (a decrease of ~240,000 since 2019). This follows after the company lost over 700,000 cord-cutting subscribers between 2018 and 2019. It’s the only service of its kind in the market that’s sustaining such heavy losses. (The now-discontinued PlayStation Vue also saw its subscriber counts decline.)

Other services exist in this space, although their subscriber numbers are difficult to come by. The most notable is Vidgo. As for Philo, its numbers are also not regularly reported because, like Vidgo, the service is not publicly traded or part of a publicly-traded company and is not required to report that kind of data. 

7. Some live TV service prices are up over 100% in two years

Even as cord-cutting options for live TV slowly make their way to market, their prices have gone up remarkably in the past few years. Almost every live TV streaming service that’s been on the market for more than a year has experienced at least one price increase. Most have imposed multiple price increases since launching. 

Almost every live TV streaming service increased prices in 2020, with one major price increase that occurred at the start of 2021.

  • AT&T TV: After phasing out its AT&T TV Now service, AT&T rolled its cord-cutting option into its broader AT&T TV offering. That also came along with a price increase that saw the base price rise from $65 per month to $69.99 per month.
  • YouTube TV: Google increased the price of its single live TV streaming package from $40 to $49.99 per month in 2019, and then up to $64.99 per month in 2020. 
  • Philo: Although Philo technically didn’t raise prices in 2019, it did drop its $16 per month plan, leaving just its higher-priced $20 plan.
  • FuboTV: Every package available through fuboTV received a $10 per month increase, starting with its “Fubo” package which jumped from $44.99 per month to $54.99 per month. The company then reorganized its package offering in 2020, and again in early 2021 that resulted in the base price rising to $64.99 per month.
  • Hulu + Live TV: Hulu increased prices on its Live TV service in late 2019 by $10 per month, raising it from $44.99 to $54.99 per month. Then in 2020, it increased prices again to $64.99 per month
  • Sling TV: The company delivered its second price increase in its 5-year history in late 2019. Its Orange and Blue packages increased to $30 per month from $25 per month, while its combo package increased from $40 per month to $45 per month. Then in 2002, it increased prices again, this time to $35 per month for its Orange and Blue packages, and to $50 per month for its Orange+Blue package. 
  • PlayStation Vue: Although the service expired in January 2020, Sony added an extra $5 per month on every package the service offered in the middle of 2019. The minimum price went from $45 to $50 per month. PS Vue officially shut down in 2019.
  • Vidgo: Vidgo’s pricing history has been weird and chaotic since it first hit the scene in 2018. The base cost started at $39.99 for its English package, before dropping to $19.99 in 2019 when the company introduced a light package. Then the base price increased back up to $45 per month in 2020. As of 2021, the service costs $55 per month with just one package option.

Almost universally, these price increases were far from insignificant—especially for AT&T TV Now. That service increased its entry-point subscription price in 2019 by 30 percent compared to its price in 2018. Only the now-canceled PlayStation Vue service had more modest price increases across its packages. 

Meanwhile, Philo remained the lowest-cost major player despite a pseudo price increase. The company dropped its smaller and cheaper package in favor of a single-package option. 

Price increases for these services are almost always tied to demands from the channel providers. Carriage fees are increasing for cord-cutting services and traditional cable TV services alike as the channel providers they offer (local broadcast networks, in particular) ask for more money. 

cord cutting statistics carriage fee increases
Source: Armstrong

In fact, local broadcast network fees are up over 600 percent since 2006, while all TV network fees (local, premium, and cable networks) are up around 90 percent since 2009. 

8. AT&T TV is over 50% more expensive than its competitors on the high end

The slow plod toward higher streaming service prices has caused a fair amount of hand-wringing. Few services have received as much ire or backlash for this approach than AT&T. Its DirecTV to AT&T TV Now to AT&T TV name changes were already enough to cause some frustration among customers. But its consistent and exceptionally high price increases have really put customers off the service, leading to the massive subscriber losses we’ve mentioned earlier.

Based on our analysis, the company has consistently offered higher prices for its most expensive package since 2019.

You can use the table above to explore the data a bit further. When filtering by year, you’ll see that 2017 was a real break-out year for multi-channel streaming video providers hitting the market. And most, at that time, were still what we consider “middle cost” services with an entry point that was below $50 per month. When

Starting in 2019, however, services began breaching the “high cost” $50+ range. AT&T was the worst offender on that end, as its highest-tier plan leaped 57% in price, from $75 to $135. Then, in 2020, its base package also dramatically jumped in price, from $50 per month to $65 per month, a 26% increase. It’s hardly any wonder why the company also saw a heavy subscriber bleed that year, as well.

Our data also shows the dramatic difference between Philo and its competitors. The service has only moved its cost basis up one time in the past four years and continues to straddle between the “middle cost” and “low cost” range at $20 per month, where it’s been for three years.

9. US Cord-Cutters have access to over 5 times more on-demand services than most other countries

If your intuition leads you to believe that the US leads the world in on-demand streaming, you’d be correct. While data on the exact numbers of services available worldwide can be spotty, according to data parsed from JustWatch, other countries aren’t even close.

JustWatch data shows that there are (at this time of writing) nearly 190 on-demand streaming services available to US cord-cutters. By comparison, the average worldwide is just 35 streaming services. That means the US has five times the number of on-demand streaming services as other countries.

We also looked to see whether population size and per capita income influenced the number of streaming services available in each country. There’s only a moderate correlation between per capita income and the number of services a country might have (R-Square = 0.22). That correlation drops to 0.19 if you exclude the major outlier (the US).

Still, we did find that there’s an interesting uptick in services when per capita gets lower, and an uptick when a country’s per capita income sits between $40K and $60K USD.

There’s also a moderate, and stronger, correlation between the number of services available in a country and its population when you exclude the major outlier in the JustWatch data (India). In that case, there’s an R-Squared value of 0.33, compared to just 0.06 when India is included.

10. Search interest in vMVPDs is up 150% since 2015

Aggregated Google Trends data reveals that cord-cutters are increasingly interested in live TV streaming services, with no signs of stopping. In fact, aggregated search interest from 2015 to the end of 2020 for the 10 major vMVPDs to hit the market reveals search interest in these services was the highest it’s ever been in September 2019.

cord-cutting stats and facts vMVPD trends data

Sling TV was the first major cord-cutting service to launch on the market, offering an “a la carte” live TV model (although fuboTV preceded it by one month, but with a soccer-only streaming service). It was later followed by PlayStation (also 2015). Meanwhile, 2017 was a breakout year for this niche as five out of the seven largest multi-channel streaming TV providers launched that year. The most recent major service launch was AT&T WatchTV, which entered the market in 2018. WatchTV was a direct response to the no-sports Philo.

Based on search trends, September appears to be when search interest in vMVPDs spikes, most likely due to this being the month the biggest services make major announcements or service changes.

Of the 10 major vMVPDs that have launched onto the US market since 2015, two have since gone out of business: PlayStation Vue and AT&T WatchTV.

11. YouTube TV is now the most-searched vMVPD on the market

Sling TV’s place on the market, combined with its successful marketing campaigns, helped it dominate in the OTT space for most of the past five years. However, increased competition is now eating away at its market share. This is evidenced both by Sling TV’s slowing subscriber growth rate, as well as the negative search interest it’s experiencing on search engines.

The real breaking point for Sling TV appears to have been late October/early November 2017, or around six months after YouTube TV officially entered the market. Google soft-launched its YouTube TV service in only a handful of major cities but rapidly expanded the service area by the end of 2017. YouTube TV’s search interest finally reached a sustained dominance over Sling TV in January 2019, the same month Google officially announced that its YouTube TV service was available everywhere in the US.   

As our data indicated above, Sling TV does appear to now be struggling. Its subscriber count has gone negative in the past year, alongside AT&T TV (which has seen a much larger subscriber bleed). It’s still the second-most searched for OTT service on the US market when compared to the other four popular OTT services (YouTube TV, Hulu + Live TV, Philo, and FuboTV). 

While YouTube TV completely dominates this space, every other service is now clamoring for the #2 spot. Philo, FuboTV and Hulu + Live TV have all seen their presence grow as Sling TV declines. 

Nevertheless, the most important data to go on here are not Trends search interest numbers, but subscriber counts. On that end, Hulu with Live TV is the clear winner with over 3 million subscribers as of 2020. 

12. The on-demand streaming market is getting fierce—and overcrowded

Netflix is currently the biggest over-the-top (OTA) on-demand streamer available for cord-cutters. The company was the first to successfully deliver a real on-demand streaming experience to subscribers, giving it an edge over the growing number of competitors. By the end of 2019, Netflix had over 167 million subscribers worldwide. 

Now, there are hundreds of on-demand streaming services crowding the market, all competing for a limited number of subscribers. One study found 70 percent of consumers think there are too many choices on the market right now, which is not good news for new entrants. 

The most notable new players include:

  • Disney+: Launched November 12, 2019, in select countries, with worldwide launches scheduled through 2021 
  • Apple TV+: Launched November 1, 2019, worldwide
  • Peacock (NBC): Launches July 15, 2020
  • Discovery+: Launched January 4, 2021
  • HBO Max: Launched May 2020
  • Quibi: Launched April 6, 2020

Outside of this, cord cutting allows users to choose between over 100 different niche on-demand services. This market saturation has created what some observers are calling a streaming service bubble.  When that bubble will burst, however, is difficult to predict. 

Currently, most Americans only pay for three streaming services. Providers need to either convince Americans to pay for more services, persuade them to drop a pre-existing service, or develop tricky plans to get TV fans to add more without thinking about it (such as by bundling services with wireless phone plans). 

13. Cord cutters are attracted to original content

Companies like Netflix, Hulu, and HBO are in an arms race of sorts over original content. One analysis found that cord cutters are driven primarily by original content when they choose to subscribe to streaming services. 

This was confirmed by a 2019 Deloitte survey, which found that 57 percent of US streaming service subscribers are driven by original content. On a more granular level, 71 percent of millennials stated that original content was their primary motivating factor. 

14. On-demand streaming services respond by spending big on original content

The number of on-demand services in the market is helping to drive up original content spending budgets. Consumers are hungry for unique and original stories, and providers are trying to win subscribers by providing high-quality content consumers can’t find anywhere else. 

The biggest original content spenders include:

As providers deliver bigger budgets to their original content writers, cord-cutters are certainly benefiting even as they hit their breaking point for how many services they want to pay for.

Unsurprisingly, password sharing is increasing as a result. Major services like Netflix and others are now considering cracking down on the practice. One study even puts the cost of password sharing on the streaming industry at $9.1 billion in lost potential revenue

15. The COVID-19 pandemic caused a 72% decrease in top-rated Netflix content releases

Hollywood came to a grinding halt in 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. We are just now starting to see the damage, and for Netflix’s release schedule, the damage was huge. The company has two types of content releases: TV shows and movies it produces and owns through its studios or through partners, and content it licenses from other copyright holders. 

As the pandemic set in and production halted, Netflix released 72% fewer TV shows and movies with high ratings (IMDb scores of 80% or more) from its own production cycle than it did in 2019.

To note, Netflix has produced far more content than what our data shows. We included only TV shows and movies Netflix has released that earned a score of 8/10 or higher on IMDb. Since 2008, Netflix has produced 164 titles and licensed 67.

Prior to the pandemic, Netflix was rapidly increasing the number of titles it produced. Covid-19 put a halt to that in a rather dramatic fashion. To keep the flow of content going, however, Netflix instead increased the number of titles it was licensing. The company licensed and released 12 high-rated TV shows and movies in 2020, compared to 9 in 2019.

The company overall tends to produce for more top-rated content than its licenses. For example, 43 TV shows and movies Netflix produced and released in 2019 currently hold an 80% or better on IMDb, compared to just 9 TV shows or movies that the company licenses that were released in 2019. 

See also: How to change Netflix region

Cord-cutting predictions for 2021 and beyond

There are some interesting trends to watch going forward. Here are five key predictions on the future of cord-cutting statistics:

In 2019, we correctly predicted that AT&T TV Now and AT&T TV would be discontinued. We also correctly predicted that Peacock’s free tier would be a subscriber-draw, that YouTube TV would raise prices, and that Netflix would raise prices on American subscribers. We also predicted that HBO Max would confuse subscribers but have a surprising level of success (also true).

Here are some of our predictions for 2021 through 2022:

  • Fox will accelerate its transformation of Tubi TV by adding even more live TV channels. It will eventually add a paid tier to the service for premium content.
  • Major streaming services will continue to phase out free trials
  • “Free with ads” tiers will increase across on-demand streaming services
  • The Vidgo live TV streaming service will either get purchased by a competitor or will completely shut down after failing to draw subscribers
  • Apple TV+ will begin licensing content to boost its lackluster content library
  • Sling TV will have a major change to its service, which could potentially include shutting down at the extreme end